Source: civil aviation flower
I saw an article in the cover news about the progress of the investigation into the incident in which the Shan Airlines flight landed and deviated from the runway at Jinan Airport.
As a matter of fact, after this incident happened, Hua heard some details from insiders, which he thought was outrageous at that time, but he had just seen the results of the bureau's investigation and was not much different from the "rumors" he had heard at that time.
On July 30 last year, Shan Airlines deviated from the runway during landing on runway 19 of Jinan Airport, resulting in damage to the side lights of the runway and the aircraft, which constituted a serious symptom of the transport aviation.
Among the survey results given by the bureau, there are several key points:
1. The tower informed the crew of the heavy rain at Jinan Airport that night.FeaturebuyThere was relevant information, but the captain continued to approach until the landing was off the runway.
Heavy rain at night can not carry out approach and landing operations, most domestic aviation departments have similar manual regulations, this provision is not difficult to understand, and it is also a common operating standard, why did the captain knowingly commit it? Or the captain doesn't know this rule at all? It's hard to understand.
2. After the plane landed and deviated from the runway, the crew did not report to the air traffic control, so they contacted the leaders many times in the process of taxiing in an attempt to fix the matter. People in the industry all know that this is an outrageous idea. Who dares to hide such a thing? Besides, it can't be covered at all. If you take care of the company, can you take care of the airport and air traffic control at the same time? Who dares to take this responsibility?
3. After the plane slid into place, the crew got off the plane and checked and found that there were weeds in the landing gear. They were still hesitant to report it or not, and hesitated again and again before reporting to the tower. It's hard to understand.
As the plane deviated from the runway, the side lights of four runways were directly damaged.
According to the bureau's investigation report, the unit did not report to the tower until at least 20 minutes after it deviated from the runway. After receiving the report, the tower closed the runway, resulting in a return flight in the air, eight standby aircraft, and eight aircraft waiting for ground take-off.
In the more than 20 minutes after the crew reported late, neither the tower nor the airport knew about it, and other flights were operating normally. A total of five planes landed and nine took off. Fortunately, there were no other consequences.
Looking at the course of this incident, it is hard to imagine that there is such a captain in our flight team who wants to coordinate and lead after breaking through the standard operation. this is no longer a problem of flight technology. I feel that the brain circuit is really something like that.
Also, if something goes wrong, dare to contact the leader of the company directly, what is the origin of this?
When something like this happens, you always want to coordinate. What about usually?